Today’s FT article estimates Twitter is sending – conservatively – 70,000 text messages a day across its service. If, as Ed French commented on this blog, each text costs a minimum of 1p to send, Twitter is burning through 700 quid a day or $1,379.57, or $38,627.96 a month. It could in fact be three times as much if they are using a more robust SMS gateway service which costs more like 3p a text, or $115,883.88. All this for (apparently) no return since there is no advertising on the messages, none on the web pages (as far as I remember, since today the service is down because of all the media attention it’s getting) and no subscription business model either. As I said before, Twitter is really onto something here, especially the API aspect, but now I’m wondering if this isn’t just starting to smell like a dotcom era story. The one thing in their favour right now is great mojo and press, and an ability to capture the community. They just need to work out what to do next – the hard bit. Or maybe they just sell it for squillions and someone else has to…
About
Mike Butcher is a former editor of New Media Age magazine, speaker and currently editor of TechCrunch Europe. Read more

Recent Posts
My Twitter updates
Recent Comments
- Destiny on Confessions of a social software addict
- The Big Question: How do you think British innovation, science and technology will evolve over the next ten years? on About
- Todd Doubleu on Wordle cloud of Twitter lists I am listed on
- Al Pascual on Wordle cloud of Twitter lists I am listed on
- “Ich wünscht, ich hätte Twitter erfunden!” – Ein Interview mit Mike Butcher, TechCrunch Europe | myON-ID Blog on About
Archives
- November 2009
- August 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- July 2002
- May 2002
- March 2002
- January 2002
Is this the Web 2.0 business
Is this the Web 2.0 business model of choice? Please buy us out and do something with out great money losing idea?
No, it’s the Web 1.0
No, it’s the Web 1.0 business model of choice. That’s my point… (Maybe web 2.0 hype is reverting back to Web 1.0 hype… I’ll shut up now).
Don’t forget that SMS is
Don’t forget that SMS is somewhat strange in the USA. It’s not unusual for the receiver to pay rather than the sender.
Maybe they should forget about TXT and focus on getting IM running again. Keep the costs down.
Nice Site!
http://google.com
Nice Site!
http://google.com