The lessons from BackFence.com

There are some fascinating lessons to be learned from the closure of BackFence.com in the US. I think the most salient come in the comments to this story, namely that:

• "Hyper-local is about utility and networks of people, not citizen journalism"

• "they approached the problem from the top down rather than working to organize and shape existing natural local networks and chatter"

• "See the existing 72,000+ public ‘neighborhood’ Yahoo Groups (and who knows how many private groups) and the fast growing Facebook Regional networks as proof points of scalable hyper-local models...and the focus of these services isn’t even hyper-local!"

It's clear to me, having watched the debates about citizen journalism (effectively ordinary people acting like reporters) on the one hand and social media (like MySpace, Facebook, even YahooGroups) on the other, that in every scenario social media wins. Why? Because of time. The simple fact is most people don't have time to create content around their local area. Believe me, I've done it (professionally as a local newspaper journalist, and privately as a local activist). It's a pain!

The only thing that makes it easier is being able to do it in "gulps" as in "Here's the local phone number for this service" or "here's where you sign up for this". That's it. Most people can't do much more and those that could don't have the time. Microblogging and Facebook status updates are literally a gift from heaven in this scenario.

That's why social networks which give local people the tools to connect and create knowledge selfish/selflessley will win in this game. That's also why local newspapers are potentially screwed.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://mbites.com/trackback/683

And in the mid-1990s in the

And in the mid-1990s in the UK, we had the failures in cable television of attempts at local TV news with Channel One (DMGT, I think) and the Mirror Group's local versions of LiveTV.

The rise of broadband could, in theory, enable some service to aggregate locally produced news video. There may be a role model for this from Austria:

http://if.futurescape.co.uk/2005/05/telekom_austria.html

But such aggregation is still far from easy - can ITV Local deliver such a service?

My view? Not a chance. It's

My view? Not a chance. It's a software issue not a media issue. By the time ITV has caught up with this issue, Facebook or its replacement (Google is planning one) will be a TV channel as well anyway.

Hyperlocal news can and will

Hyperlocal news can and will draw an audience, and advertisers, if the content is journalistically sound, reliable, detailed and timely--and is constantly changing. We've proved this with our project called The Rappahannock Voice (www.rappvoice.com) which covers news in little Rappahannock County, Virginia (population, 7,000) The county is poorly served by the media (no radio station, no daily newspaper, no TV coverage, one weekly newspaper). There's a market for daily reports on government bodies, local events, real estate and business, people, environmental news, etc. And there are local advertisers who will pay to advertise their businesses (real estate agents, accountants, landscapers, service providers, etc.) if they believe the content will attract local readers. It's a lot of work and demands a lot of time, but in our case the audience was waiting for the service, and the audience keeps expanding, well beyond the folks who live in Rappahannock County. It can work anywhere, if you can supply good reporting, clear writing and timely information needed in daily lives. It ain't brain surgery--it's just solid journalism delivered in a new, convenient way--and it's going to eat local newspapers alive.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
More information about formatting options