<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike Butcher &#187; Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mbites.com/category/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mbites.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s new keyword ad system</title>
		<link>http://mbites.com/2007/10/23/facebooks_new_keyword_ad_system/</link>
		<comments>http://mbites.com/2007/10/23/facebooks_new_keyword_ad_system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mbites.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Facebook has quietly launched a keyword advertising system to rival Google&#8217;s AdSense. Disguised as a simple upgrade to Flyers, its system for selling cheap ads on a self-service basis, the new system charges per click and lets advertisers target by city, gender, age, relationship status, employer, educational level, political views, and keywords. Facebook has the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Facebook has quietly launched a <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/facebook/who-needs-google-facebooks-stealth-ad-system-313354.php">keyword advertising system</a> to rival Google&#8217;s AdSense. Disguised as a simple upgrade to Flyers, its system for selling cheap ads on a self-service basis, the new system charges per click and lets advertisers target by city, gender, age, relationship status, employer, educational level, political views, and keywords. Facebook has the data, generated by its users and the new system will have &#8220;detailed reporting&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mbites.com/2007/10/23/facebooks_new_keyword_ad_system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual worlds open for marketing</title>
		<link>http://mbites.com/2007/08/09/virtual_worlds_open_for_marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://mbites.com/2007/08/09/virtual_worlds_open_for_marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Worlds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mbites.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Brands buying advertising space inside virtual worlds are free to do so in the UK, since the Advertising Standards Authority state that only ads in the &#39;public realm&#39; &#8211; for example, those placed on a virtual billboard &#8211; would fall within its remit. In other words there are basically no restrictions. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Brands buying advertising space inside virtual worlds <a href="http://www.nma.co.uk/Logon/ResourceBarrier.aspx?RequiredServices=17,%7C&amp;PipelinedPage=/Articles/34455/Brands+free+to+use+virtual+worlds+to+target+kids.html&amp;PipelinedQueryString=liArticleID%3d34455">are free to do so in the UK</a>, since the Advertising Standards Authority state that only ads in the &#39;public realm&#39; &#8211; for example, those placed on a virtual billboard &#8211; would fall within its remit. In other words there are basically no restrictions. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mbites.com/2007/08/09/virtual_worlds_open_for_marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook still running ads on racist groups</title>
		<link>http://mbites.com/2007/08/05/facebook_still_running_ads_on_racist_groups/</link>
		<comments>http://mbites.com/2007/08/05/facebook_still_running_ads_on_racist_groups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mbites.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Adverts continue to appear beside far-right and racist groups on Facebook despite major advertisers pulling their campaigns following revelations that their brands were appearing alongside such groups.


First Direct, Vodafone, Virgin Media, Halifax, AA, and Prudential have already pulled their ads after finding they were appearing next to the far-right BNP party, following a story broken [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Adverts continue to appear beside far-right and racist groups on Facebook despite major advertisers pulling their campaigns following revelations that their brands were appearing alongside such groups.
</p>
<p>
First Direct, Vodafone, Virgin Media, Halifax, AA, and Prudential have already pulled their ads after finding they were appearing next to the far-right BNP party, following a story broken by <a href="http://www.nma.co.uk/Logon/ResourceBarrier.aspx?RequiredServices=17,%7C&amp;PipelinedPage=/Articles/34350/Big+brands+find+their+ads+placed+on+BNP's+Facebook+group.html&amp;PipelinedQueryString=liArticleID%3d34350">New Media Age</a> this week.
</p>
<p>
But research by <a href="http://tbites.com">tbites</a> has found that adverts continue to appear alongside groups associated with the BNP, including the groups <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2325464132">BNP &#8211; People Just like you making a difference</a>, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2208635889">Old-Fashioned Fascists</a> and <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2385701684">Vote BNP and Save The World</a>.
</p>
<p>
In each case the advert in question is for <a href="http://Searchanything.co.uk">Searchanything.co.uk</a>, an affiliate advertising search engine run by <a href="http://Advertising.com">Advertising.com</a> International Ltd, the UK subsidiary of US-based Advertising.com Inc, one of the world&#8217;s largest interactive advertising network. There is no suggestion that Advertising.com is aware that their adverts are appearing beside these groups. In all likelihood there is an automated script making these ads appear which Facebook appears not to have taken down.
</p>
<div class="image">
<a href="image/bnp"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/bnp1.gif"  alt="BNP" /></a>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mbites.com/2007/08/05/facebook_still_running_ads_on_racist_groups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook still running ads on racist groups</title>
		<link>http://mbites.com/2007/08/05/facebook_still_running_ads_on_racist_groups-2/</link>
		<comments>http://mbites.com/2007/08/05/facebook_still_running_ads_on_racist_groups-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tbites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mbites.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Adverts continue to appear beside far-right and racist groups on Facebook despite major advertisers pulling their campaigns following revelations that their brands were appearing alongside such groups.


First Direct, Vodafone, Virgin Media, Halifax, AA, and Prudential have already pulled their ads after finding they were appearing next to the far-right BNP party, following a story broken [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Adverts continue to appear beside far-right and racist groups on Facebook despite major advertisers pulling their campaigns following revelations that their brands were appearing alongside such groups.
</p>
<p>
First Direct, Vodafone, Virgin Media, Halifax, AA, and Prudential have already pulled their ads after finding they were appearing next to the far-right BNP party, following a story broken by <a href="http://www.nma.co.uk/Logon/ResourceBarrier.aspx?RequiredServices=17,%7C&amp;PipelinedPage=/Articles/34350/Big+brands+find+their+ads+placed+on+BNP's+Facebook+group.html&amp;PipelinedQueryString=liArticleID%3d34350">New Media Age</a> this week.
</p>
<p>
But research by <a href="http://tbites.com">tbites</a> has found that adverts continue to appear alongside groups associated with the BNP, including the groups <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2325464132">BNP &#8211; People Just like you making a difference</a>, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2208635889">Old-Fashioned Fascists</a> and <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2385701684">Vote BNP and Save The World</a>.
</p>
<p>
In each case the advert in question is for <a href="http://Searchanything.co.uk">Searchanything.co.uk</a>, an affiliate advertising search engine run by <a href="http://Advertising.com">Advertising.com</a> International Ltd, the UK subsidiary of US-based Advertising.com Inc, one of the world&#8217;s largest interactive advertising network. There is no suggestion that Advertising.com is aware that their adverts are appearing beside these groups. In all likelihood there is an automated script making these ads appear which Facebook appears not to have taken down.
</p>
<div class="image">  <img src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/bnp1.gif"  alt="BNP" />
<div class="caption"> </div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mbites.com/2007/08/05/facebook_still_running_ads_on_racist_groups-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook doubles ad rates inside four months</title>
		<link>http://mbites.com/2007/08/03/facebook_doubles_ad_rates_inside_four_months-2/</link>
		<comments>http://mbites.com/2007/08/03/facebook_doubles_ad_rates_inside_four_months-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tbites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mbites.com/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Since February, Facebook has doubled its ad rates for sponsored groups from $150,000 to $300,000 in the US, reports ValleyWag which has obtained Facebook&#8217;s PowerPoint rate-card deck. Facebook now says it&#8217;s the top photo site. The minimum sponsorship remains $50,000, and Facebook claims the click-through rate is 20 times that of banners. This higher fee [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Since February, Facebook has doubled its ad rates for sponsored groups from $150,000 to $300,000 in the US, reports <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/online-advertising/facebook-doubles-its-rates-in-four-months-284562.php">ValleyWag</a> which has obtained Facebook&#8217;s PowerPoint rate-card deck. Facebook now says it&#8217;s the top photo site. The minimum sponsorship remains $50,000, and Facebook claims the click-through rate is 20 times that of banners. This higher fee means the number of homepage links and sponsored stories advertisers get also doubles.
</p>
<p>
<img src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/facebookadrates.gif" height="421" width="362" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Facebookadrates" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mbites.com/2007/08/03/facebook_doubles_ad_rates_inside_four_months-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook doubles ad rates inside four months</title>
		<link>http://mbites.com/2007/08/03/facebook_doubles_ad_rates_inside_four_months/</link>
		<comments>http://mbites.com/2007/08/03/facebook_doubles_ad_rates_inside_four_months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mbites.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Since February, Facebook has doubled its ad rates for sponsored groups from $150,000 to $300,000 in the US, reports ValleyWag which has obtained Facebook&#39;s PowerPoint rate-card deck. Facebook now says it&#39;s the top photo site. The minimum sponsorship remains $50,000, and Facebook claims the click-through rate is 20 times that of banners. This higher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Since February, Facebook has doubled its ad rates for sponsored groups from $150,000 to $300,000 in the US, reports <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/online-advertising/facebook-doubles-its-rates-in-four-months-284562.php">ValleyWag</a> which has obtained Facebook&#39;s PowerPoint rate-card deck. Facebook now says it&#39;s the top photo site. The minimum sponsorship remains $50,000, and Facebook claims the click-through rate is 20 times that of banners. This higher fee means the number of homepage links and sponsored stories advertisers get also doubles. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="image">  <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/online-advertising/facebook-doubles-its-rates-in-four-months-284562.php"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/facebookadrates.gif" alt="fb rates" height="337" width="370" /></a>
<div class="caption"> </div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mbites.com/2007/08/03/facebook_doubles_ad_rates_inside_four_months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three signs Aardman for ad-supported videos</title>
		<link>http://mbites.com/2007/08/03/three_signs_aardman_for_ad-supported_videos/</link>
		<comments>http://mbites.com/2007/08/03/three_signs_aardman_for_ad-supported_videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mbites.com/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
UK mobile network Three has signed Aardman Animations, creators of the Wallace and Gromit series of animations, to supply video &#8220;snack&#8221; content. Has the Aardmanâ€™s â€˜Angry Kidâ€™ series of video shorts which are paid downloads, but  this new package is ad-supported, and will feature old favourites such as Creature Comforts, A Town Called Panic, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
UK mobile network Three has <a href="http://news.awn.com/index.php?ltype=cat&amp;category1=Internet+and+Interactive&amp;newsitem_no=20514">signed</a> <a href="http://www.aardman.com/">Aardman Animations</a>, creators of the Wallace and Gromit series of animations, to supply video &#8220;snack&#8221; content. Has the Aardmanâ€™s â€˜Angry Kidâ€™ series of video shorts which are paid downloads, but  this new package is ad-supported, and will feature old favourites such as Creature Comforts, A Town Called Panic, Purple &#38; Brown and Morph. 3&#8217;s ad-supported video service is operated by <a href="http://rhythmnewmedia.com">Rhythm NewMedia</a>.
</p>
<p>
&#8220;Launching an ad-supported service is the next step in a strategy, which will continue Aardman&#8217;s leadership in mobile animation services,&#8221; said Robin Gladman, digital product manager at Aardman Animations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mbites.com/2007/08/03/three_signs_aardman_for_ad-supported_videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online offers smart media owners potential for growth. Fact.</title>
		<link>http://mbites.com/2007/07/30/online_offers_smart_media_owners_potential_for_growth_fact-2/</link>
		<comments>http://mbites.com/2007/07/30/online_offers_smart_media_owners_potential_for_growth_fact-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mbites.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Head of digital for the Guardian Media Group Simon Waldman hits back with both barrels today at John Duncan and his assertion in a previous issue of Press Gazette that online teams have â€˜connedâ€™ unsuspecting newspaper boards into making investments in online publishing.


Here are some key quotes from his piece in today&#8217;s Press Gazette:


&#8220;The current [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Head of digital for the Guardian Media Group Simon Waldman <a href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&amp;storycode=38340&amp;c=1">hits back with both barrels</a> today at <a href="http://blog.inksniffer.com/">John Duncan</a> and his assertion in a previous issue of Press Gazette that online teams have â€˜connedâ€™ unsuspecting newspaper boards into making investments in online publishing.
</p>
<p>
Here are some key quotes from his piece in today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&amp;storycode=38340&amp;c=1">Press Gazette</a>:
</p>
<p>
<em>&#8220;The current forecasts for growth in the UK market indicate that, on average, digital spending in the UK will grow from a Â£2bn market to approximately Â£4bn over the next two years. In other words, there is likely to be some Â£2bn of new money coming online. But isnâ€™t much of this going to search engines (particularly, Google)? Well, even if 50 per cent of it is, that still leaves Â£1bn of new money left for us to fight for&#8230;.&#8221;
</p>
<p>
&#8220;&#8230;Last month PricewaterhouseCoopers forecast that we will move from 50 per cent of households having broadband this year to 80 per cent by 2011. All the evidence shows that the longer people have a connection, the more time they spend doing things online. So internet use in the UK is set to grow for many years yet&#8230;&#8221;
</p>
<p>
Waldman&#8217;s conclusion is that while &#8220;print has many healthy decades ahead.. those will be about gentle, and sometimes not so gentle, decline.&#8221; Waldman has also been blogging recently about whether the Dialy Express will simply close as a result of the change in the media landscape.</em>
</p>
<p>
The online world, meanwhile, &#8220;offers smart media owners potential for growth â€“ in reach, reputation and revenue. Thatâ€™s not a con. Itâ€™s a fact. And itâ€™s time to learn to deal with it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mbites.com/2007/07/30/online_offers_smart_media_owners_potential_for_growth_fact-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook is the new AOL</title>
		<link>http://mbites.com/2007/06/30/facebook_is_the_new_aol/</link>
		<comments>http://mbites.com/2007/06/30/facebook_is_the_new_aol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mbites.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
ValleyWag today runs an interesting insider piece from a startup developing Facebook applications. Until recently FB members could invite all their friends to an app. creating massive viral adoption. Hence why some apps like Top Friends by Slide ended up with millions of users. Now Facebook is limiting app invitations to just 10 per day. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/hypebusting/facebook-has-thrown-the-entire-startup-world-for-a-loop-273359.php">ValleyWag</a> today runs an interesting insider piece from a startup developing Facebook applications. Until recently FB members could invite all their friends to an app. creating massive viral adoption. Hence why some apps like Top Friends by Slide ended up with millions of users. Now Facebook is limiting app invitations to <strong>just 10 per day.</strong> That mean anyone creating a new app and trying to go viral has a mountain to climb. This is basically Facebook shooting themselves in the foot. Previously there seemed to be a great ecosystem developing where startups would be able to hook into revenue share deals based on the adoption of their app. Now, the &#8216;head&#8217; of the apps &#8216;long tail&#8217; will win because FB has artificially rigged the system in favour of those apps that came out before the &#8220;invite all&#8221; gate closed. Given that there are even  a few UK developers who were banking on the Facebook app platform to create some success, this news makes for some depressing reading. Why is Facebook the new AOL? It&#8217;s just another a walled garden baby&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mbites.com/2007/06/30/facebook_is_the_new_aol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS buys Last.fm for $280m, plans more ads</title>
		<link>http://mbites.com/2007/05/30/cbs_buys_lastfm_for_280m_plans_more_ads/</link>
		<comments>http://mbites.com/2007/05/30/cbs_buys_lastfm_for_280m_plans_more_ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.mbites.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As hinted at back in February, Last.fm has been trawling around looking for a buyer and today it found its harbour in the form of a US media giant. The &#8217;social music&#8217; site has been bought by CBS Corporation for $280m (Â£140m). This is less than the earlier rumour, but still the largest-ever buyout of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
As <a href="http://tbites.com/2007/02/lastfm-on-the-block">hinted at</a> back in February, <a href="http://Last.fm">Last.fm</a> has been trawling around looking for a buyer and today it found its harbour in the form of a US media giant. The &#8217;social music&#8217; site <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6701863.stm">has been bought by</a> CBS Corporation for $280m (Â£140m). This is less than the earlier rumour, but still the largest-ever buyout of a UK-based &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; site.
</p>
<p>
The site was founded in the UK five years ago (you may have heard the stories about the founders sleeping on the office roof in a tent when they couldn&#8217;t afford accommodation). It now has more than 15 million active users. Users basically connect with other listeners with similar music tastes, build their own personal radio stations and watch music video-clips.
</p>
<p>
Although the announcement today says that Last.fm&#8217;s managing team (founders Felix Miller, Martin Stiksel and Richard Jones) will stay and the site will maintain its own separate identity, I can&#8217;t see this staying this way forever, now that it&#8217;s part of CBS, which will probably ditch the European sensibility of the service.
</p>
<p>
Stiksel reportedly said: &#8220;This move will really support us to get every track ever recorded and every music video ever made onto Last.fm.&#8221; He also says LastFM will &#8220;put the users in charge. CBS gets this.&#8221; Time will tell, time will tell.
</p>
<p>
Meanwhile for the less cynical among you, here is co-founder Richard Jones on <a href="http://blog.last.fm/2007/05/30/lastfm-acquired-by-cbs">the company blog today</a>:
</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;The team here have spent a lot of time this year discussing what the future should hold for Last.fm, and while contemplating raising some additional venture capital we were approached by CBS. As you can imagine, we have been approached numerous times in the past few years from all the usual suspects regarding acquisitions and so on; CBS are one of the few companies who needed no explanation of what we are doing, and we were impressed at how progressive their plans are. This deal with CBS gives us a chance to really make Last.fm shine, and gives us more flexibility than other funding options would for doing all the crazy stuff weâ€™re had scribbled on whiteboards for years.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>
So why did CBS buy it? CBS radio is the largest radio group in the United States, with 179 stations in the top 50 markets, but traditional media growth is stagnating and all the action &#8211; as everyone knows, especially when it comes to music and the youth market &#8211; is all online. The purchase thus adds to an advertising portfolio that already includes conventional radio, broadcast and cable TV and outdoor services.
</p>
<p>
CBS now has a strategy of reaching as big an audience as possible, not on creating content. It sounds like they plan to rely more on the users and viewers themselves to do that. In fact, CBS CEO Leslie Moonves says Last.fm&#8217;s community play us &#8220;central to CBS&#8221;.  In truth CBS is coming late to the now established idea that music is a natural community builder and therefore a very &#8217;sticky&#8217; eyeball attractor. As an anonymous CBS executive has <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-cbs30may30,1,3380181.story?ctrack=1&amp;cset=true">already said</a>: &#8220;We see it as a chance to get new eyeballs â€” or in this case earlobes.&#8221;
</p>
<p>
As for the price, it looks easily affordable by US standards. Consider some earlier deals: News Corp bought MySpace for $580m (Â£290m) in 2005. Google paid $165bn (Â£82bn) YouTube in 2006. But according to the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-cbs30may30,1,3380181.story?ctrack=1&amp;cset=true">LA Times</a>, the final price for closely held Last.fm could rise substantially if performance targets are met. Last.fm got its first round of funding last May from Index Ventures.
</p>
<p>
There may be a problem for LastFM in that in the US the recent ruling by the Copyright Royalty Board massively increases the royalties Internet broadcasters have to pay for streaming digital songs. This has already hit <a href="http://Pandora.com">Pandora</a>&#8217;s plans to expand outside the US.
</p>
<p>
However advertising may offer more hope. Although LastFM recommends music for purchase, sales are not in fact a big revenue earner. Instead CBS will probably create sponsored channels, garnering bigger corporate deals with its existing sales contacts.
</p>
<p>
Expect also CBS radio stattions to start to appear on LastFM. Country <em>AND</em> Western anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mbites.com/2007/05/30/cbs_buys_lastfm_for_280m_plans_more_ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
